Author:
Hartzell Caroline A.,Hoddie Matthew,Bauer Molly
Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies that have explored the effects of economic liberalization on civil war have employed aggregate measures of openness and have failed to account for potential endogeneity bias. In this research note, we suggest two improvements to the study of the relationship between liberalization and civil war. First, emphasizing that it is processes that systematically create new economic winners and losers rather than particular levels of economic openness that have the potential to generate conflict, we consider the effects of one oft-used means of liberalizing economies: the adoption by countries of International Monetary Fund (IMF) structural adjustment programs. Second, we use a bivariate probit model to address issues of endogeneity bias. Analyzing all data available for the period between 1970 and 1999, we identify an association between the adoption of IMF programs and the onset of civil war. This finding suggests that IMF programs to promote economic openness unintentionally may be creating an environment conducive to domestic conflict.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference56 articles.
1. World Bank. 2006. World Development Data and Statistics 2006. Accessed Through World Development Indicators Online. Available at ⟨http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/DATASTATISTICS/0,,menuPK:232599∼pagePK:64133170∼piPK:64133498∼theSitePK:239419,00.html⟩. Accessed 8 January 2010.
2. Identification of multiple equation probit models with endogenous dummy regressors
3. Free Markets & Food Riots
4. The IMF and Economic Development
5. The Political Performance of Governments, External Debt Service, and Domestic Political Violence
Cited by
55 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献