Abstract
Abstract
Despite advances in impact assessment (IA) practice in Arctic regions, persistent challenges remain. This article examines how baseline information needs and associated uncertainties are presented and understood in the regulatory context of IA. The focus is on marine-related information needs in the Nunavut IA process. The method used a document review of operational IA reports and focus groups with the Nunavut Impact Review Board – the agency responsible for IA in the territory. The results show that information challenges are largely linked to the availability, suitability and accessibility of data; while challenges to addressing information needs are related to broad capacity constraints, as well as responsibility, and cooperation among parties to the process. Similar to other settings, in Nunavut, there is a need to develop better guidance for parties regarding information uncertainties in IA and how such may be addressed. To help address information needs, there is also a need to clarify the roles, responsibilities and expectations of all parties (e.g. Inuit organisations, proponent, government and communities), as well as improving coordination and advancing collaboration, while also addressing capacity constraints.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference50 articles.
1. A review of uncertainty research in impact assessment
2. COSEWIC. (2002). COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Bering Wolffish Anarhichas orientalis in Canada. Ottawa: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Retrieved from https://wildlife-species.canada.ca/species-risk-registry/virtual_sara/files/cosewic/sr_bering_wolffish_e.pdf (accessed Aug. 18, 2022).
3. Nunavut Impact Review Board. (2015). Final Hearing Report – Kiggavik Uranium Mine Project. Cambridge Bay, Nunavut: Nunavut Impact Review Board. 150508-09MN003-NIRB Final Hearing Report-OT9E.pdf (accessed May 9, 2020).