Author:
Sahu Novneet,Matthews Patrick,Groner Kathryn,Papas Mia A.,Megargel Ross
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionContinuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves outcomes in patients with respiratory distress. Additional benefits are seen with CPAP application in the prehospital setting. Theoretical safety concerns regarding Basic Life Support (BLS) providers using CPAP exist. In Delaware’s (USA) two-tiered Emergency Medical Service (EMS) system, BLS often arrives before Advanced Life Support (ALS).HypothesisThis study fills a gap in literature by evaluating the safety of CPAP applied by BLS prior to ALS arrival.MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study using Quality Assurance (QA) data collected from October 2009 through December 2012 throughout a state BLS CPAP pilot program; CPAP training was provided to BLS providers prior to participation. Collected data include pulse-oximetry (spO2), respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), skin color, and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) before and after CPAP application. Pre-CPAP and post-CPAP values were compared using McNemar’s and t-tests. Advanced practitioners evaluated whether CPAP was correctly applied and monitored and whether the patient condition was “improved,” “unchanged,” or “worsened.”ResultsSeventy-four patients received CPAP by BLS; CPAP was correctly indicated and applied for all 74 patients. Respiratory status and CPAP were appropriately monitored and documented in the majority of cases (98.6%). A total of 89.2% of patients improved and 4.1% worsened; CPAP significantly reduced the proportion of patients with SpO2<92%, RR>24, and cyanosis (P<.01). The GCS improved from mean (standard deviation [SD]) 13.9 (SD=1.9) to 14.1 (SD=1.9) after CPAP (mean difference [MD]=0.17; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.83; P=.59). The HR decreased from 115.7 (SD=53) to 105.1 (SD=37) after CPAP (MD=-10.9; 95% CI, -3.2 to -18.6; P<.01). The SpO2 increased from 80.8% (SD=11.4) to 96.9% (SD=4.2) after CPAP (MD=17.8; 95% CI, 14.2-21.5; P<.01).ConclusionThe BLS providers were able to determine patients for whom CPAP was indicated, to apply it correctly, and to appropriately monitor the status of these patients. The majority of patients who received CPAP by BLS providers had improvement in their clinical status and vital signs. The findings suggest that CPAP can be safely used by BLS providers with appropriate training.SahuN, MatthewsP, GronerK, PapasMA, MegargelR. Observational study on safety of prehospital BLS CPAP in dyspnea. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):610–614.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Emergency Nursing,Emergency Medicine
Reference16 articles.
1. Advanced Life Support for Out-of-Hospital Respiratory Distress
2. The Argument for BLS CPAP;Wesley;JEMS,2013
3. Patterson P , Freeman V , Moore C , Slifkin R . Becoming an Emergency Medical Technician: Urban-Rural. In Working paper no. 89; 2007. Chapel Hill, North Carolina USA: University of North Carolina.
4. T HE U SE OF P REHOSPITAL C ONTINUOUS P OSITIVE A IRWAY P RESSURE T REATMENT IN P RESUMED A CUTE S EVERE P ULMONARY E DEMA
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献