Terrorists Use of Ambulances for Terror Attacks: A Review

Author:

Jasani Gregory N.ORCID,Alfalasi Reem,Cavaliere Garrett A.,Ciottone Gregory R.,Lawner Benjamin J.

Abstract

AbstractIntroduction:Using an ambulance as an attack modality offers many advantages to a terrorist organization. Ambulances can carry more explosives than most vehicles and can often bypass security. Yet, studies examining how terrorist organizations have incorporated ambulances into their attacks are lacking.Study Objective:This article seeks to identify and analyze known instances in which an ambulance has been used in a terrorist attack.Methods:The Global Terrorism Database (GTD) was searched for terrorist events that involved the use of an ambulance from the years 1970-2018. Variables of event time, location, and loss of life were analyzed.Results:Twenty instances where an ambulance had been used in a terrorist attack were identified from the GTD. Fifteen of the attacks occurred in the Middle East, while the remaining five occurred in Southeast Asia. All attacks except one had occurred after 2001, and 13 had occurred within the past decade. Most attacks (12/20) resulted in up to three people killed, while six attacks had 10-20 casualties. The deadliest attack occurred in Kabul, Afghanistan in 2018 and caused over 100 casualties. One event did not have casualty information in the GTD. In all cases, ambulances were used as vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIED) by terrorist organizations.Conclusion:This study shows that terrorists are increasingly acquiring and utilizing ambulances in their attacks, often with deadly consequences. Security and public health experts must be aware of this hazard and work to deny terrorists access to these vehicles.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Emergency,Emergency Medicine

Reference14 articles.

1. 3. US Department of Homeland Security. Incident Site Security: Secondary Attacks. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=765478. Accessed May 10, 2020.

2. “Trojan Ambulances”: an emerging threat

3. 8. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism (START), University of Maryland. The Global Terrorism Database (GTD) [Data file]. 2019 https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd. Accessed May 8, 2020.

4. 2. US Department of Homeland Security. Planning Considerations: Complex Coordinated Terrorist Attacks July 2018. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1532550673102-c4846f270150682decbda99b37524ca6/Planning_Considerations-Complex_Coordinated_Terrorist_Attacks.pdf. Accessed May 9, 2020.

5. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3