Abstract
It has been easy to take the apparently detached viewpoint of the two early Greek epics as actually objective, a window on a ‘Heroic Age’, on a ‘Homeric society’ and its values. We used to ask whether ‘Homeric society’ belongs to the poets' own time or to some earlier one. We still ask how to characterize and explain the ways in which the ‘Homeric world’ differs from any world that we can accept as having existed: we answer with phrases such as ‘poetic exaggeration’ and ‘epic distance’. We have constructed ‘Homeric society’, but it remains an isolate. It can tell us nothing in return of the poets' intentions, or of the society of their time, unless we have a working hypothesis as to the place in that society that was held by the poets and their audiences.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Reference57 articles.
1. Taplin , Homeric Soundings, p. 40
2. Van Wees , Status Warriors, p. 32, n. 25
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Male Nudity in the Greek Iron Age;2022-08-31
2. Ptolis et agorè. Homère et l’archéologie de la cité‑État*;Gaia revue interdisciplinaire sur la Grèce Archaïque;2020-06-01
3. Sponsors and Enemies of Literature;A Companion to Greek Literature;2015-08-14
4. Bibliography;A Companion to Food in the Ancient World;2015-07-03
5. Le Web de Pénélope;Revue d'anthropologie des connaissances;2014