Abstract
Few years pass without an attempt to interpret Theocritus,Idyll7. The poem's narrative and descriptive skill, dramatic subtlety and felicity of language are mercifully more than adequate to survive these scholarly onslaughts, so I have less hesitation in offering my own interpretation.The poem's chief problems seem to me to arise from uncertainty as to:(a) Who is the narrator, and why are we kept waiting until line 21 before we are told that he is called Simichidas?(b) Who, or what sort of man, is the goatherd Lycidas, whom he encounters on his way from town to the harvest festival?Answers to these questions fundamentally affect our interpretation of their exchange of songs, which occupies almost half the idyll, and of Lycidas' gift of his stick to Simichidas; and these interpretations will go far towards interpreting the poem as a whole.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Reference54 articles.
1. Römische Studien
2. Epigramm und Skolion
3. Robert L. , ‘Recherches Epigraphiques’, Rev. des Ét. Anciennes (1960), 300 ff.
4. Hubaux J. , ‘La dieu Amor chez Properce et chez Longus’, Acad. Roy. de Belgie (Bull. Cl. des lettres et des sc. mor. et poi.) 5.39 (1953), 263–70
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion and Epilogue;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
2. Columella and the Poetics of Horticulture;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
3. Trampling in the Garden;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
4. Women in the Garden;Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16
5. Vergil’s Garden (Georgics 4.116–48);Ancient Roman Literary Gardens;2024-08-16