Abstract
The distribution of the parts among the actors in theO.C.is a problem that has long defied solution. In all the other extant plays of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides the dramatis personae can without difficulty be divided between three actors: but the construction of theO.C.is so complex that it does not admit any such simple allocation. When the part of Oedipus (1–1555) has been assigned to the first actor, and that of Antigone (1–847, 1099–555, 1670–end) to the second, the roles of the Stranger (36–80), Ismene (324–509, 1099–555 mute, 1670–end), Creon (728–1043), and Polyneices (1254–446) must clearly belong to the third: who, then, is to play Theseus (551–667, 887–1043, 1099–210, 1500–55, 1751–end)? It seems impossible to allot the partcompleteto any one of the three actors. Faced by this crux, all those who have dealt with the subject have chosen one or the other of two clear-cut alternatives, either the assumption of a fourth regular actor, or else the splitting-up of the single part of Theseus between two or three actors. These two alternatives, both of which are far from satisfactory—the former infringing the three-actor rule, the latter offending against scenic probability and realism—are fully examined below; at the end of the paper a new part-distribution is suggested, which, it is hoped, avoids both these faults.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Reference51 articles.
1. Aesch . Cho. 891–9
2. Haigh , Attic Theatre 3, 1907, p. 234, n. 2
3. Die Rollenvertheilung im sophokleischen Oedipus auf Kolonos;Teuffel;Rheinisches Museum für Philohgie,1854
4. Wecklein N , Oed. Col., 1880, Einleitung , p. 8
5. Schneidewin , Oedipus auf Kolonos, 2nd ed. 1854
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Edipo en Colono y la guerra civil en Atenas;Dossier : Les « mystères »;2016
2. Role Doubling;The Encyclopedia of Greek Tragedy;2013-11-26
3. SophoclesDidaskalos;A Companion to Sophocles;2013-01-29
4. Copyright Page;Gilbert Murray Reassessed;2007-08-01
5. Dedication;Gilbert Murray Reassessed;2007-08-01