Abstract
Grote's powerful defence of Thrasyllus' canon should have taught us at least not to reject lightly any dialogue which, like the Hippias Maior, is there classed as genuine. The burden of proof lies with those who attack our dialogue. Raeder, Ritter, and Apelt consider it to be genuine, while Ast, Jowett, Horneffer, and Röllig declare against it, as also Gomperz, Zeller, and Lutoslawski.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Philosophy,History,Classics
Reference8 articles.
1. Gillespie C. M. in the Class. Quart., 07, 1912
2. la théorie des idées n'a rien à voir ici;Budé;Platon
3. Ritter , Unters. über Plato (1888), p. 97
4. Ritter , Neue Untersuch. ii. Platon, pp. 228–326
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献