Author:
Reznick J. Steven,Goldfield Beverly A.
Abstract
ABSTRACTTwenty-four infants were followed longitudinally from 1;2 to 1;10. Parents maintained diaries of the child's spoken words and at two-month intervals completed a representative checklist of words produced. There was good agreement across the two instruments and robust month-to-month correlations for both. However, the overall pattern of results suggests that the diary method is more effective during the early emergence of language and the representative checklist method is more effective late in the second year when vocabulary size becomes relatively large. Accurate longitudinal assessment of vocabulary may require a combination of the diary and checklist approaches.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Psychology,Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference10 articles.
1. The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at twenty months
2. The Validity of a Parent Report Measure of Vocabulary and Syntax at 24 Months
3. Beeghley M. , Jernberg E. & Burrows E. (1989). Validity of the Early Language Inventory for use with 25-month olds. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, Kansas.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献