StagingEmile: Audience and Genre in Collective Self-Legislation

Abstract

AbstractRousseau's interpreters often disagree over whether theEmileprepares its protagonist for membership in theSocial Contract’s political community or presents him as an alternative to it. I argue that such attempts to determine the compatibility of Rousseau's different “projects” obscures his broader engagement with his contemporary popular audiences—particularly those associated with the theater and the novel—and the political implications therein. In contrast to the above debate, I turn toEmileto argue that in this work Rousseau attempts to shape readers in distinct and crucial ways.Emiledoes not simply present precepts to be embraced but intervenes into the underlying communicative dynamics that need to obtain for Rousseau's conception of collective self-legislation. It does so by shifting between the theatrical and novelistic generic conventions identified in his prior engagements with popular audiences, thus generating a reading experience that orients readers to continuously revisit their constitution as a collective audience.