Abstract
In recent years, a number of political thinkers in philosophy, political theory and law have defended political theories which are deeply indebted to classical republicanism. Like classical republicans, these thinkers have claimed that a flourishing polity depends upon citizens' exercise of the civic virtues. Unlike classical republicans, some of these thinkers have defended what might be called “political republicanisms”—republicanisms which are also indebted to the methodological restraint of Rawls's political liberalism. The article argues that political republicanism suffers from a viability problem. Its list of civic virtues is too short. More worrisome, the public justifications that would be available to a political republican regime are not sufficient to motivate the development of the civic virtues. Therefore, if we are to be republicans, we should be “perfectionist republicans” instead.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Rawls , Political Liberalism, p. 10.
2. Creation, p. 427.
3. Summa Theologiae I–II,61,5
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. John Rawls e Hannah Arendt;Veritas (Porto Alegre);2023-11-24
2. Civic virtue in non-ideal republics;Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy;2023-08-30
3. Perfectionism, Public Reason and Excellences;Analysis;2023-06-11
4. Republicanism and moralised freedom;Politics, Philosophy & Economics;2023-04-04
5. Civic Solidarity and Public Health Ethics;Philosophies;2023-01-18