Abstract
AbstractThis article reinterprets Thucydides's analysis of the post-Periclean turn in Athenian politics by reading it within the context of contemporary “tragic” and “scientific” explanatory traditions. It finds in this analysis an ambitious attempt to reinvent the traditional, tragic pattern of hubris-driven reversal by reinterpreting its underlying causal logic according to a scientific perspective in which the overdetermining effects of deities are replaced by the variable power dynamics of democratic deliberation. The resultant analysis identifies a change in the relative standing of leaders as the determining cause of democratic reversal, not the absolute decline in leadership, thus tracing the Athenian turn towards hubris, great error, and civil discord to the egalitarian ordering of the post-Periclean assembly. In so doing, it shows how Thucydides's analysis posed a powerful challenge to previous attempts, both tragic and scientific, to prognosticate the fate of imperial democracy, as well as offering an exemplary moment of Thucydides's synthetic approach towards tragic and scientific explanatory perspectives.
Funder
Einstein Stiftung Berlin
American Council of Learned Societies
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference45 articles.
1. Parrhesia and the Demos Tyrannos: Frank Speech, Flattery and Accountability in Democratic Athens;Landauer;History of Political Thought,2012
2. Thucydides Homericus and the Episode of Mycalessus (7.29–30): Myth and History, Space and Collective Memory;Fragoulaki;Histos,2020
3. A Commentary on Thucydides, Vol. 1: Books I–III
4. The Humanity of Thucydides