Abstract
AbstractDevelopment approaches to the study of politics, precisely because they focus on movement through time, seem uniquely positioned to illuminate the logic and experience of the polity in a manner that cannot be captured by more conventional political science methods. And yet, political development has come to be seen as whatever historical change happens to a regime, neglecting the normative nature of the polity. The result is an “a-constitutional” approach to political development. This paper argues that political science can and should examine development in normative terms and that attempts to fit political development more securely within value-free social science threaten to rob it of its promise.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference62 articles.
1. The Rise of Constitutional Theocracy;Hirschl;Harvard International Law Journal Online,2008
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion;Deciphering the Genome of Constitutionalism;2024-03-21
2. Emerging Trends;Deciphering the Genome of Constitutionalism;2024-03-21
3. Dysfunctional Constitutionalism or Dysfunctional Politics: A Matter of Law, Politics, and Institutional Design;Politische Vierteljahresschrift;2023-11-09
4. The rule of law as a universal value and the diversity of constitutional identity;Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law;2020
5. Tocqueville’s “New Political Science” as a Correction of The Federalist;Exploring the Social and Political Economy of Alexis de Tocqueville;2020