Abstract
AbstractCrucial in the design process, Technology Readiness Levels are a common form of technology maturity assessment. Studies suggest that the TRL scale can be subjective and biased. Automating the assessment can reduce human bias. This paper highlights important challenges of automation by presenting data collected on 15 technologies from the nanotechnology sector. Our findings show that, contrary to claims from the literature, patent data exists for low maturity technologies and may be useful for automation. We also found that there exists unexpected trends in data publications at TRL 2, 3 and 4.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference10 articles.
1. Document classification techniques for automated technology readiness level analysis
2. Development of Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Metrics and Risk Measures
3. Using the TRL-methodology to design supporting ICT-tools for production operators;Fast-Berglunda;Elsevier,2014
4. Innovation forecasting
5. A bibliometric method for assessing technological maturity: the case of additive manufacturing;Lezama-Nicolás;Scientometrics. Springer International Publishing,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献