Abstract
AbstractThis article comments on Schut and van de Ven's overview of the results of purchaser competition in Dutch health care, which concludes that the glass can be seen as half full or half empty. Although it is true that results have been achieved, we believe that the evidence is incomplete and in some respects flimsy. More importantly, however, Schut and van de Ven neglect the political context of the market reform introduced in 2006. The reform is far from finished and there has been a constant need for political compromise. Optimism about the market's potential also seems to be on the wane. Several insurer and provider initiatives have provoked political resistance. As a result, there are good reasons to argue that the reform's future is uncertain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference12 articles.
1. ‘Universal mandatory health insurance in the Netherlands’;van de Ven;Health Affairs,2008
2. Effects of purchaser competition in the Dutch health system: is the glass half full or half empty?
3. RVZ (Raad voor de Volksgezondheid en Zorg) (2009), ‘Steunverlening zorginstellingen’ (report). Zoetermeer.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献