Abstract
AbstractComplementarity and mutual influence inform the interaction between international humanitarian law and international human rights law in most cases. In some cases when there is contradiction between the two bodies of law, the more specific norm takes precedence (lex specialis). The author analyses the question of in which situations either body of law is more specific. She also considers the procedural dimension of this interplay, in particular concerning the rules governing investigations into alleged violations, court access for alleged victims and reparations for wrongdoing.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference26 articles.
1. The united use of force rule revisited: the penetration of the law of armed conflict by international human rights law;Forrest Martin;Saskatchewan Law Review,2002
2. Living in Denial: The Application of Human Rights in the Occupied Territories
3. THE PRINCIPLE OF SYSTEMIC INTEGRATION AND ARTICLE 31(3)(C) OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION
4. The approach of the European Commission and Court of Human Rights to international humanitarian law
5. The relationship between the human rights regime and the laws of armed conflict;Draper;Israel Yearbook on Human Rights,1971
Cited by
98 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献