Rationalising the use of cardiac catheterisation before Glenn completion

Author:

James Lorraine,Tandon Animesh,Nugent AlanORCID,Malik Sadia,Ramaciotti Claudio,Greil Gerald,Zabala Luis,Forbess Joseph,Hussain Tarique

Abstract

AbstractPrevious studies have shown that cardiac MRI can be used to evaluate the suitability for infants to undergo the Glenn operation after having undergone the Norwood procedure. We sought to analyse our institutional data retrospectively to identify whether such a policy would be advisable in the current era. We reviewed patients who underwent the Norwood procedure between 1 January, 2006 and 1 January, 2016. All patients undergoing evaluation for the Glenn procedure received clinical evaluation, echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation. A total of 179 patients were identified; 154 patients (86%) survived to undergo cardiac catheterisation as part of evaluation for the Glenn, and all who were evaluated did not eventually receive the Glenn. Using said algorithm, if cardiac MRI or CT were to be used to rationalise the use of catheterisation, 26 of 154 patients would have required catheterisation after cross-sectional imaging identified vascular obstruction; 83 of 154 patients would have received cross-sectional imaging only; and 45 of 154 would have had catheterisation only. All cases that required intervention, excluding aortopulmonary collaterals, and all cases that were not suitable to progress would have been correctly identified using clinical and echocardiographic criteria in addition to cardiac cross-sectional imaging to rationalise the use of catheterisation. Thus, in cases with acceptable clinical, echocardiographic, and angiographic findings, the additional haemodynamic information from catheterisation is rarely of use for decision-making, and interventions can largely be predicted by angiographic imaging modalities.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3