Author:
Franklin Rodney C. G.,Béland Marie J.,Colan Steven D.,Walters Henry L.,Aiello Vera D.,Anderson Robert H.,Bailliard Frédérique,Boris Jeffrey R.,Cohen Meryl S.,Gaynor J. William,Guleserian Kristine J.,Houyel Lucile,Jacobs Marshall L.,Juraszek Amy L.,Krogmann Otto N.,Kurosawa Hiromi,Lopez Leo,Maruszewski Bohdan J.,St. Louis James D.,Seslar Stephen P.,Srivastava Shubhika,Stellin Giovanni,Tchervenkov Christo I.,Weinberg Paul M.,Jacobs Jeffrey P.
Abstract
AbstractAn internationally approved and globally used classification scheme for the diagnosis of CHD has long been sought. The International Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code (IPCCC), which was produced and has been maintained by the International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease (the International Nomenclature Society), is used widely, but has spawned many “short list” versions that differ in content depending on the user. Thus, efforts to have a uniform identification of patients with CHD using a single up-to-date and coordinated nomenclature system continue to be thwarted, even if a common nomenclature has been used as a basis for composing various “short lists”. In an attempt to solve this problem, the International Nomenclature Society has linked its efforts with those of the World Health Organization to obtain a globally accepted nomenclature tree for CHD within the 11th iteration of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). The International Nomenclature Society has submitted a hierarchical nomenclature tree for CHD to the World Health Organization that is expected to serve increasingly as the “short list” for all communities interested in coding for congenital cardiology. This article reviews the history of the International Classification of Diseases and of the IPCCC, and outlines the process used in developing the ICD-11 congenital cardiac disease diagnostic list and the definitions for each term on the list. An overview of the content of the congenital heart anomaly section of the Foundation Component of ICD-11, published herein in its entirety, is also included. Future plans for the International Nomenclature Society include linking again with the World Health Organization to tackle procedural nomenclature as it relates to cardiac malformations. By doing so, the Society will continue its role in standardising nomenclature for CHD across the globe, thereby promoting research and better outcomes for fetuses, children, and adults with congenital heart anomalies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference39 articles.
1. Sherry A . Children’s Hospital cardiology chief told to resign. Denver Post, 2001. Retrieved September 8, 2017, from http://extras.denverpost.com/news/news0301b.htm.
2. Retrieved September 24, 2017, from http://www.wolfbane.com/icd/.
3. World Health Organization. History of the development of the ICD. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/HistoryOfICD.pdf.
4. The importance of nomenclature for congenital cardiac disease: implications for research and evaluation
5. Congenital Heart Surgery Nomenclature and Database Project: overview and minimum dataset