Abstract
Songhay sources compiled in the seventeenth century portray the relationship between Gao, the political capital of the state, and Timbuktu, the religious and commercial centre, as abnormally important. The view is that Timbuktu was not only autonomous, but a source of important political influence over policy decisions at Gao. A consensus of contemporary scholars has embraced this depiction. In contrast, the present study argues that Timbuktu was not autonomous, but that Gao was sucessful in achieving its original objective in capturing the city: financial profit. In addition, the evidence is consistent in outlining the relatively negligible political influence of Timbuktu over Gao. The Timbuktu-centric chronicles are largely responsible for this distortion; it is therefore necessary to approach these sources with even greater caution. It is also desirable to re-examine the roles of other sahelian entrepots during the imperial Songhay period to determine more accurately their relative importance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference69 articles.
1. Saad , Social History, 52
2. The social and economic stability of the Western Sudan in the Middle Ages;Malowist;Past and Present,1966
3. Hunwick , ‘Songhay, Borno and the Hausa states’, 341.
4. Cissoko , Tombouctou, 107–8
5. The Inland Niger Delta before the Empire of Mali: Evidence from Jenne-Jeno
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献