German Capital, The Netherlands Railway Company and the Political Economy of the Transvaal 1886–1900

Author:

Van Helten J.J.

Abstract

This article tries to throw light on one aspect of the ‘business partition’ of Africa, namely Anglo–erman economic rivalry on the Rand between 1886 and 1900. It examines the activities of the German-owned Netherlands South African Railway Company (N.Z.A.S.M.), which possessed the monopoly of construction and management of all railways connecting the republic with a seaport. The article assesses this company's impact upon the relations of the South African Republic with both the maritime colonies of the Cape and Natal and with Great Britain. Whitehall regarded the N.Z.A.S.M. as the fountainhead of ever-increasing German commercial and political penetration in the Transvaal and also considered the railway company hostile to its interests in that it allegedly discriminated against British commerce. The gold-mining industry also viewed the company with hostility, since its high freightrates increased the price of imported machinery, foodstuffs, etc. The South African Republic, on the other hand, saw the N.Z.A.S.M. as a useful means of access to both the German and Dutch capital markets, while the company arranged for diplomatic lobbying in Berlin and The Hague in favour of the Republic.By 1898, German mining interests on the Rand had managed to persuade Berlin that their interests were not served by either the Kruger regime or the German-owned N.Z.A.S.M. and that an administration more favourably disposed towards their objectives, and possibly imposed by force by the British, should not be opposed. It is therefore argued that the South African War was prompted mainly by the desire to establish British commercial hegemony on the Rand, to safeguard the interests of international mining capital and to create a more pliable polity capable of articulating and responding to these particular economic imperatives.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History

Reference63 articles.

1. Imperial business in Africa. Part II: Interpretations;Hopkins;J. Afr. Hist.,1976

2. Finance Capital and South African Goldmining 1886–191;Kubicek;Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History,1975

3. Nilant F. G. E. , ‘Jhr. G. Beelaerts van Blokland, Gesant van die Suid Afrikaansche Republiek, 1843–1897’ (Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of the Witwatersrand, 1952), 157.

4. Nilant , ‘Beelaerts’, 213.

5. Blainey G. , ‘Lost causes’, 355.

Cited by 33 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Blockade by other Means or How to Deal with Neutrals? Britain and its Experience of the Second Boer War;The International History Review;2024-01-22

2. The War that Bond Markets Did not Perceive as Such;Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought;2020

3. How Mineral Discoveries Shaped the Fiscal System of South Africa;Fiscal Capacity and the Colonial State in Asia and Africa, c.1850–1960;2019-11-30

4. Early regulation and social organisation on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange, 1887–1892;Business History;2019-05-30

5. Boer Republics;South Africa;2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3