Abstract
ABSTRACTUsing newly available evidence, mainly from the Public Records Office (now the National Archive) in London, this article attempts to unravel the true extent of the role that British oil interests played in the decision of the British government to insist on a ‘One Nigeria’ solution in the Nigeria/Biafra conflict. While the official position of the British government was that its main interest in the Nigeria conflict was to prevent the break-up of the country along tribal lines, the true position was more complex. Evidence in this paper suggests that British oil interests played a much more important role in the determination of the British attitude to the war than is usually conceded. Specifically, Britain was interested in protecting the investments of Shell-BP in Nigerian oil. Furthermore, Britain was also at the time desperate to keep Nigerian oil flowing in order to mitigate the impact of its domestic oil shortfalls caused by the Middle East Six Day War. Supporting a ‘One Nigeria’ solution was considered its safest bet in order to achieve the above objectives.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference39 articles.
1. Biafra and Bangladesh: The Political Economy of Secessionist Conflict
2. THE DOMESTIC JURISDICTION CLAUSE IN THE OAU CHARTER
3. The political economy of the Nigerian oil sector and the civil war;Okolo;Quarterly Journal of Administration,1981
4. Locational Effects of the Civil War on the Nigerian Petroleum Industry
5. The role of the Ivory Coast in the Nigeria–Biafra war;Baker;African Scholar,1970
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献