Author:
ANDERSON DAVID,CARRIER NEIL
Abstract
ABSTRACTEfforts to institute a system for the control and prohibition of khat in Kenya are examined in this article. Prohibition was introduced in the 1940s after an advocacy campaign led by prominent colonial officials. The legislation imposed a racialized view of the effect of khat, seeking to protect an allegedly ‘vulnerable’ community in the north of the country while allowing khat to be consumed and traded in other areas, including Meru where ‘traditional’ production and consumption was permitted. Colonial policy took little account of African opinion, although African agency was evident in the failure and ultimate collapse of the prohibition in the face of widespread smuggling and general infringement. Trade in khat became ever more lucrative, and in the final years of colonial rule economic arguments overcame the prohibition lobby. The imposition of prohibition and control indicates the extent to which colonial attitudes towards and beliefs about cultural behaviour among Africans shaped policies, but the story also illustrates the fundamental weakness of the colonial state in its failure to uphold the legislation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference5 articles.
1. Khat use and mental illness: A critical review
2. Khat-induced Paranoid Psychosis
3. Khat induced psychosis and its medico-legal implication: a case report;Alem;Ethiopian Medical Journal,1997
4. The consequences of khat use: a review of literature;Zaghloul;European Journal of Psychiatry,2003
5. Khat Chewing from the Pharmacological Point of View: An Update
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献