Predicting contraceptive method usage among women in West Scotland

Author:

Hunt Kate,Annandale Ellen

Abstract

SummaryUsers of the six major methods of contraception are compared across a broad range of variables using data from a community sample. Differences between the groups were apparent for a range of socioeconomic and reproductive variables, and current users of the various methods also differed in their past use of contraception. Users of barrier methods fared particularly well. Few differences were observed for current health status or for the sociocultural variables examined, although users of natural methods differed from all others in their religious affiliation and commitment.Discriminant analysis showed that the most predictive variables distinguishing women who had opted for permanent methods of contraception (female sterilization and vasectomy) were the woman's stated reason for using her current method and her past contraceptive patterns; the inclusion of social, health and reproductive indicators did little to improve the prediction. It is argued that heightened expectations for contraceptive efficacy in the face of increasing concerns about long-term health consequences have contributed to the increased use of permanent methods.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Social Sciences

Reference24 articles.

1. Determinants of oral contraceptive use in northern Italy

2. Trends in contraceptive method usage since 1970;Wellings;Br. J. Fam. Plann.,1986

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study;Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care;2006-04-01

2. “Every child a wanted child”: Mid-life women's experiences of contraception;Women's Studies International Forum;2002-07

3. Vasectomy and prostate cancer in Québec, Canada;Health & Place;2001-06

4. Sterilization and vasectomy;Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine;2001-01-01

5. STERILISATION OF MARRIED COUPLES: HUSBAND VERSUS WIFE STERILISATION;Journal of Biosocial Science;1998-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3