Abstract
AbstractThe role of the ‘ideal’ in political philosophy is currently much discussed. These debates cast useful light on Mill's self-designation as ‘under the general designation of Socialist’. Considering Mill's assessment of potential property-relations on the grounds of their desirability, feasibility and ‘accessibility’ (disambiguated as ‘immediate-availability’, ‘eventual-availability’ and ‘conceivable-availability’) shows us not only how desirable and feasible he thought ‘utopian’ socialist schemes were, but which options we should implement. This, coupled with Mill's belief that a socialist ideal should guide social reforms (as the North Star guides mariners), reveals much more clearly the extent of his socialist commitments (even if he thought political economists would be concerned with forms of individual property for some time to come). Moreover, this framework for assessments of ‘ideal’ institutions makes a useful contribution to an ongoing contemporary debate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On the Concept of Care in J. S. Mill’s Liberal Utilitarianism;The European Legacy;2023-12-18
2. Response to comments – John Stuart Mill, socialist;History of European Ideas;2022-04-07
3. John Stuart Mill and the Conflicts of Equality;The Journal of Ethics;2022-02-26
4. Index;History and Historiography in Classical Utilitarianism, 1800–1865;2021-10-31
5. Bibliography;History and Historiography in Classical Utilitarianism, 1800–1865;2021-10-31