Abstract
The recent Curtin–Inikori debate has revealed a basic shortcoming in the historiography of the eighteenth-century French slave trade. In computing the size of the French trade, historians have too long relied either on questionable estimates published by eighteenth-century authors or on published material about one port, Nantes. Enough material exists in various French archives to produce a more accurate appraisal of at least one aspect of the trade. An analysis of captains' reports and other documents shows that French exports from Africa were somewhat greater than Curtin believed, and that Curtin's errors resulted from limitations imposed by the published data. At the same time, it is almost impossible to know how many slaves were imported into the French West Indies during the eighteenth century, as an illegal British trade accounted for a significant percentage of the slaves delivered to the French colonies.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference16 articles.
1. Measuring the Atlantic Slave Trade: An Assessment of Curtin and Anstey
2. Revue française d'histoire d'outre-mer, lxvii (1975)
3. Measuring the Atlantic Slave Trade
4. Facteurs de mortalité dans le trafic français d'esclaves au XVIIIe si`cle;Engerman;Annales: Economies, Sociétés Civilisations,1976
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献