Abstract
The 1930s American Dust Bowl created archetypal “Dust Bowl migrants,” refugees from environmental collapse. I examine this archetype, comparing migration from more-eroded and less-eroded counties to distinguish Dust Bowl migrants from other migrants. Dust Bowl migrants were “negatively selected,” in years of education, compared to other migrants who were “positively selected.” Dust Bowl migrants had lower incomes than natives in their destinations, which is reflected in popular impressions. I estimate strikingly modest impacts of the Dust Bowl on average wage incomes in 1939, however, which contrasts with the Dust Bowl’s large and enduring impacts on agricultural land.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,History
Reference52 articles.
1. Selection and Economic Gains in the Great Migration of African Americans: New Evidence from Linked Census Data;Collins;American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,2014
2. Was Postwar Suburbanization “White Flight”? Evidence from the Black Migration*
3. The Effect of Natural Disasters on Economic Activity in US Counties: A Century of Data;Boustan;NBER Working Paper,2019
4. On the spatial economic impact of global warming
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献