Abstract
AbstractBlack Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, and the Tea Party are among the many movements that have reignited media attention to protest activity. Yet, there is much to learn about what this media coverage conveys. In particular, how much does who is protesting matter for how the media portray protesters and their objectives? In this paper, we draw on an extensive content analysis of cable and broadcast news media coverage of protest activities to demonstrate substantial differences in how protests are covered depending on the race and objective of the protesters. We find that media are much more likely to depict protests by people of color using language that evokes a sense of threat by using anger- and fear-laden language than comparable coverage of protest activity involving mostly White individuals. Our results demonstrate that racial biases in news coverage are much broader than previously thought. In doing so, our work highlights the powerful role that a protester’s race plays in whether the media will condone or challenge their political voice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology
Reference88 articles.
1. Waldman, K (2015) Is Baltimore beset by protests, riots, or an uprising? Slate. Available at https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/04/protest-versus-riot-versus-uprising-the-language-of-the-baltimore-freddie-gray-unrest.html.
2. Media Bias, Perspective, and State Repression
3. The Mediating Role of Emotions
4. Media Treatment of Deviant Political Groups
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献