Abstract
Abstract
Critical Race Theory (CRT) has become a flashpoint of elite political discord, yet how Americans actually perceive CRT is unclear. We theorize that Republican elites utilized a strong framing strategy to re-define CRT as an “empty signifier” representing broader racial and cultural grievances. Using a survey and a pre-registered experiment among U.S. adults (N = 19,060), we find that this strategy worked. Republicans exhibit more familiarity with CRT and hold more negatively valenced (and wide ranging) sentiments toward CRT, relative to Democrats. Moreover, compared to teaching the legacy of racism in schools, Republicans are significantly more opposed to teaching CRT while Democrats express greater uncertainty. Our findings suggest that by framing CRT as a broad term that envelopes many grievances (including those beyond the scope of CRT), Republican elites have shaped a subset of Americans’ understanding of and attitudes toward CRT.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology
Reference54 articles.
1. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics;Crenshaw;University of Chicago Legal Forum,1989
2. Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments
3. Revocation of Executive Order No. 13950 (2021) Revocation of Executive Order 13950. Office of Personnel Management. March 8. Available at https://www.chcoc.gov/content/revocation-executive-order-13590 (accessed 10 June 2021).
4. Perspective taking combats the denial of intergroup discrimination