PUBLIC HEALTH, PUBLIC HEALTH ETHICS PRINCIPLISM, AND GOOD GOVERNANCE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
-
Published:2023
Issue:2
Volume:40
Page:306-328
-
ISSN:0265-0525
-
Container-title:Social Philosophy and Policy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Soc Phil Pol
Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic brought about at least two normative challenges on unprecedented scale for liberal democracies. One concerned prioritization decisions when health care resources were constrained. The other, which arguably led to lasting damage to social cohesion and citizens’ trust in government and government public health institutions, concerned policies introduced with the aim of reducing the spread of SARS-CoV2, some of which turned out to be mistaken. I discuss in this essay a few examples of misguided, liberty-limiting public health policies and describe how public health and public health ethics principlism provided cover for such policies. Citizens had reasons to be concerned about the duration of such liberty-infringing policies, the absence of predictable government policies, and the absence of transparent justifications for the policies that were implemented.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)