Abstract
For one with libertarian sympathies, the official regulation of foods and drugs is presumptively a bad thing. One is most accustomed to seeing the argument in debates about legalizing marijuana and other hedonic drugs. And it remains a very good if by now well-trafficked question, which will be more well-trafficked still by the time this essay ends, why government should be in the business of telling people what sorts of chemical moodenhancers they may take. But as the criminologist James Jacobs has pointed out, to ask this question is to put in play matters far larger and more important than marijuana. What business is it of government to say what medicines may be sold and by whom they may be sold? Why should certain chemical agents be available to willing buyers only with a doctor's scrip, and other agents, such as unproved drugs or devices, forbidden to all, even with medical permission? If libertarians answer these questions impatiently, then admirers of the administrative welfare state (“statists”) will be happy to play rope-a-dope with them, chattering on about the endearing eccentricities of libertarians' assumptions and avoiding the challenge to articulate and defend their own increasingly shabby-looking principles. Those principles are much in need of defense. Food and drug laws are among the most well-established offices of regulatory government. They are complicated, hypertechnical, mysterious, and expensive to administer and maintain. One is entitled to suspect that a number of them are carried on more out of habit and routine than out of any authentic conviction that they are the best way, or among the better ways, to provide for the welfare of citizens.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference62 articles.
1. Resistance of Bacteria to Antibacterial Agents: Report of Task Force 2
2. Miller Henry I. , “FDA and Regulatory Reform,” San Francisco Chronicle, 03 10, 1995, p. A23
3. Symptoms and Correlates of Anabolic-Androgenic Steroid Dependence;Brower;British Journal of Addiction,1990
4. Burros Marian , “FDA Advisory Panel Backs Approval of a Fat Substitute,” New York Times, 11 18, 1995, p. A11.
5. Shapiro Eben , “Fat Substitutes: The Long, Hard Quest for Foods That Fool the Palate,” New York Times, 09 29, 1991, p. C5.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献