Author:
Degennaro Francis P.,Weller Stephen C.
Abstract
Biotypes of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L. ♯3 CONAR) identified in Indiana varied widely in susceptibility to glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] but not to 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] or bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] in field tests. Significant differences in injury to two of the biotypes occurred with glyphosate applied at 1.12 to 4.48 kg ai/ha in greenhouse tests. Differences of greater than 70% in injury rating, root and shoot dry weight, and shoot regrowth dry weight occurred between the two biotypes at 2.24 kg/ha glyphosate. The susceptibility of the tolerant biotype at 2.24 kg/ha glyphosate was decreased by 40% as it increased in age, while the susceptible biotype sustained complete foliar necrosis when treated at all plant ages tested. Susceptibility differences between the two biotypes could not be correlated to differences in leaf stomatal or epidermal cell number. These studies suggested that the variable control of field bindweed observed in the field may be due to the occurrence of biotypes within a given population of this weed which differ in their susceptibility to glyphosate.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference14 articles.
1. Humburg N. E. and Alley H. P. 1979. Field bindweed control obtained with glyphosate, with and without 2,4-D and dicamba added. Res. Rep. Soc. West. Weed Sci. Page 16.
2. Field Bindweed: The weed and the problem;Phillips;North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Special Session on Field Bindweed.,1978
3. The Reaction of Strains of Field Bindweed to 2,4-D
4. Differential Response of Selected Clones of Bindweed to 2,4-D
5. The influence of environment on growth and control of field bindweed;Meyer;North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Special Session on Field Bindweed.,1978
Cited by
89 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献