Abstract
Little effort has been directed toward integrating biological control; that is, the use of living natural enemies to control weeds, with more conventional weed control practices. The usual focus of biological control has been on the introduction of weed insects and pathogens from foreign areas to control naturalized range, pasture, and/or aquatic weeds, principally single species that had become dominant over a plant community. The released natural enemies were allowed to reach their own balance with the target weed without added assistance. As economic and environmental perspectives change along with our knowledge and technological capability, however, it becomes worthwhile to review periodically if and how biological control might be integrated with other farming practices. Because my biological control experience has centered on the use of weed-feeding insects, this discussion will focus on methods of enhancing and integrating insect impact on weeds with other weed-control activities.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference33 articles.
1. Wilson F. 1960. A review of the biological control of insects and weeds in Australia and Australian New Guinea. Commonwealth Inst. of Biol. Contr. Techn. Commun. No. 1. 102 pp.
2. The influence of the host plant on the population dynamics of Acizzia russellae (Homoptera: Psyllidae)
3. Integration of a thistlehead weevil and herbicide for Carduus thistle control;Trumble;Prot. Ecol.,1980b
4. Impact of 2,4-D on Ceuthorhynchidius horridus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and their compatibility for integrated control of Carduus thistles
5. Shorthouse J. D. 1977. Developmental morphology of Urophora affinis galls. Pages 188–195 in Proc. Knapweed Symp., Oct. 6–7, Kamloops, BC, Canada.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献