Abstract
Bioassay and gas chromatographic procedures were evaluated for their effectiveness in detecting fluridone [1-methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone] in soil. Bioassay procedures were limited to a detection range of 0.05 to 0.45 ppmw if grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Monech) was used. Visual estimations of chlorophyll content in affected plants, used as an indicator of fluridone concentration, were as reliable as spectrophotometric determinations. Gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) procedures were less variable than the bioassay and had no upper limit of detection. Recovery of fluridone from treated soil ranged from 60 to 100 percent, depending on soil type. Soil water content affected percent recovery. Fluridone did not leach more than 1 cm in clay or sandy loam soils when up to 10 cm of water was passed through a soil column containing the herbicide, as determined by GLC. Extensive downward movement, 12 to 16 cm, occurred in a coarse sand when 5 or 10 cm of water was passed through the column.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference8 articles.
1. Effect of EL-171 on cotton and purple nutsedge;Wills;Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.,1977
2. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of fluridone in selected crop species;Berard;Weed Sci.,1978
3. Effectiveness and persistence of fluridone;Banks;Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc.,1978
4. Personal communication with Eli Lilly and Co., Lilly Res. Lab., Greenfield, IN.
5. 1-Methyl-3-phenyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4(1H)-pyridinone, a new herbicide
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献