Author:
Parochetti J. V.,Warren G. F.
Abstract
Conflicting reports on the dissipation of ie isopropylN-phenylcarbamate (IPC) and isopropylN-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate (CIPC) prompted the present investigation on the dissipation and biological activity of these two herbicides. The dissipation patterns of IPC and CIPC were similar. Under the field and laboratory conditions described, more than 90% of both herbicides was gone in 4 weeks. CIPC was biologically more active than IPC on all plants tested, and both herbicides were nearly 10 times more toxic to buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentumMoench.) in quartz sand as in a silt loam soil. Although both herbicides were present in equal amounts throughout their dissipation, CIPC appears to persist longer in field applications, as it is more toxic to most plants than IPC.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference12 articles.
1. The period of toxicity of IPC and CIPC when applied to the soil at various times of the year;Wiese;Res. Report. NCWCC,1954
2. Crabgrass Inhibition with O‐isopropyl N‐(3‐chlorophenyl) Carbamate
1
3. NOTE ON THE BIOASSAY OF CHLORPROPHAM IN SOIL
4. Effect of propham and CIPC on grass seed crops sprayed in the year of sowing;Jones;Proc. British Weed Control Conf.,1958
5. Vapor Losses of IPC and CIPC
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献