Assistive Technology and Older Adults in Disasters: Implications for Emergency Management

Author:

McSweeney-Feld Mary Helen

Abstract

AbstractThis article identifies concepts, trends, and policy gaps in the availability and service delivery of assistive technology utilized by older adults in disasters, as well as implications for emergency management planning and shelter administration. Definitions of types of assistive technology, as well as views of older adults using technology as at-risk individuals for emergency management service provision, are provided. An overview of peer-reviewed articles and gray literature is conducted, focusing on publications from 2001 to the present in the United States. Analytical frameworks used by emergency management organizations as well as regulations such as the Americans with Disabilities Act and recent court decisions on emergency shelter accessibility in disasters are reviewed. Research on the use of assistive technology by older adults during disasters is a neglected issue. The current and potential benefits of defining standards for provision and use of assistive technology for older adults during disasters has received limited recognition in emergency management planning. Older adults with disabilities utilize assistive technology to maintain their independence and dignity, and communities as well as emergency services managers need to become more aware of the needs and preferences of these older adults in their planning processes and drills as well as in service delivery during actual events. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2017;11:135–139)

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference36 articles.

1. US Department of Labor, ADA Facts. https://www.dol.gov/ofccp/regs/compliance/faqs/ADAfaqs.htm. Accessed August 17, 2016.

2. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary of Preparedness and Response. HHS Concept of Operations for ESF-8. US DHHS website. http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/mscc/handbook/chapter7/Pages/hhsconcept.aspx. Last updated February 14, 2012. Accessed October 25, 2016.

3. Communities Actively Living Independently & Free v. City of Los Angeles, No. CV 09-0287 CBM RZX, 2011 WL 4595993, (C.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011).

4. Brooklyn Center for Independence of Disabled v. Bloomberg, 980 F. Supp 2nd 588, 626 (SDNY, 2013).

5. Changes in the use of assistive devices among 90-year-old persons

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3