Abstract
AbstractLogical inferentialists claim that the meanings of the logical constants are given by their inference rules. To rule out tonk-like expressions, it is often demanded that pairs of inference rules must be harmonious. The usual inference rules for the identity predicate are not harmonious, but most inferentialists want identity to be logical. Stephen Read has tried to formulate alternative, harmonious inference rules for identity. It will be proved, however, that his rules are precisely as strong as the old rules and that, because the old rules are not harmonious (as Read argues), nor are his. Further, it will be shown that no sound rules will be any improvement. Identity remains in need of satisfactory inferentialist treatment.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Logic,Philosophy,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Logicality of Equality;Outstanding Contributions to Logic;2024
2. Introducing Identity;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2021-06-15
3. The Harmony of Identity;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2019-01-12
4. Subatomic Natural Deduction for a Naturalistic First-Order Language with Non-Primitive Identity;Journal of Logic, Language and Information;2016-04-21
5. HARMONIC INFERENTIALISM AND THE LOGIC OF IDENTITY;The Review of Symbolic Logic;2016-02-09