Abstract
AbstractFollowing a discussion of various forms of set-theoretical foundations of category theory and the controversial question of whether category theory does or can provide an autonomous foundation of mathematics, this article concentrates on the question whether there is a foundation for “unlimited” or “naive” category theory. The author proposed four criteria for such some years ago. The article describes how much had previously been accomplished on one approach to meeting those criteria, then takes care of one important obstacle that had been met in that approach, and finally explains what remains to be done if one is to have a fully satisfactory solution.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Logic,Philosophy,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Everything, More or Less: A Defence of Generality Relativism, by J. P. Studd;Mind;2021-06-18
2. Category theory and foundations of life science: A structuralist perspective on cognition;Biosystems;2021-05
3. Index;Conceptions of Set and the Foundations of Mathematics;2020-01-23
4. Bibliography;Conceptions of Set and the Foundations of Mathematics;2020-01-23
5. Concluding Remarks;Conceptions of Set and the Foundations of Mathematics;2020-01-23