Abstract
It is shown that the connection posited by Roberts (1997) between the loss of case marking and the shift from OV to VO in English is contradicted by the facts of English and the other Germanic languages. It is argued that this failure is not the result of an incorrect handling of the syntactic or morphological details, but of the way that the proposal straddles the syntax–morphology interface. Parallels are explored with research on verb raising and agreement, and it is proposed that, in order to be more than a descriptive generalization, the claim that some morphological property has a syntactic effect must be couched in terms that both the morphology and the syntax can refer to in a principled way.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Case in Germanic;The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics;2020-03-31
2. "I am years seven old." Acquisition of English word order by Bosnian and Turkish children;English Studies at NBU;2016-08-20
3. Dating and Other Conventions;Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume I;2010-08-29
4. Preface;Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume I;2010-08-29
5. Special Phonetic Symbols;Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume I;2010-08-29