Author:
Semat Joshua,Lowery David,Linn Suzanne,Berry William D.
Abstract
AbstractMost theories of government growth place nearly exclusive attention on real changes in public sector activity. Yet, much nominal post–WWII government spending growth was not in the form of the public sector doing more relative to the general economy (real growth), but in the form of government activities becoming relatively more expensive (cost growth). Baumol's (1967) “cost disease” model is our best guide to understanding cost growth, but over time, Baumol has offered conflicting hypotheses about how cost growth bears on real growth. Using 1947–2012 U.S. data, we test these hypotheses, along with a more novel expectation, by modifying Berry and Lowery's (1987b) econometric models of real growth in public purchases and transfers to consider the influence of government cost growth on real public domestic spending.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Industrial relations
Reference61 articles.
1. The Growing Cost of Government: A Test of Two Explanations;Berry;Social Science Quarterly,1984
2. Unbalanced Growth Revisited: Asymptotic Stagnancy and New Evidence;Baumol;The American Economic Review,1985
3. Does the U.S. health care sector suffer from Baumol's cost disease? Evidence from the 50 states
4. Capital in the Twenty-First Century
5. Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis;Baumol;The American Economic Review,1967