A Constitutional Ethnography of Monarchy: Buddhist Kingship, “Granted Constitutionalism,” and Royal State Ceremonies in Thailand
-
Published:2022-10
Issue:3
Volume:9
Page:363-381
-
ISSN:2052-9015
-
Container-title:Asian Journal of Law and Society
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:AsianJLS
Abstract
AbstractThis paper defines constitutional ethnography as the cultural study of constitutionalism through its symbolic representations. By focusing on the materiality of constitutionalism as embodied in various state ceremonies such as ceremonies of “royal octroy” (constitution-granting ceremonies) as well as in state monuments honouring the Constitution, it strives to offer an ethnography of a polity’s constitutional identity. In this paper, I argue that in Thailand, Westernized Hindu-Buddhist state ceremonies and monuments using Westernized Hindu-Buddhist symbolism represent the Thai monarch as the ultimate law-giver holding permanent “constituent power” and therefore yielding extra-constitutional customary powers pre-existing the Constitution. This representation, in turn, informs Thai constitutional identity as defined incrementally by courts and jurists since the early twentieth century, which in turn informs present Thai constitutional interpretation. Therefore, this paper argues that the study of state ceremonies can be a useful entry point into the analysis of a “constitutional culture” shaping modes of constitutional interpretation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference72 articles.
1. Dabphet, Siriphorn (2009) “The Coronation Ritual and Thai Kingship since the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” PhD diss., National University of Singapore.
2. Rule-of-Law Ethnography
3. Weber, Max (1958) The Religion of India. The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism, Hans Gerth & Don Martindale, trs. & eds., New York: Free Press.