Abstract
AbstractIn the 1960s and 1970s, psychologists at the University of California, Los Angeles, operated two behaviour modification programs: one aiming to eliminate “feminine” behaviours in male-bodied children (“conversion therapy”), and one targeting autistic children’s so-called problem behaviours (applied behavioural analysis or ABA). The head of the autism program referred to his work as “building a person.” Decades later in Ontario, a radically incommensurate legal context sees conversion therapy banned while ABA receives millions of funding dollars. Drawing on legislation, case law, media, and clinical literature, I argue that the process of trans communities wresting themselves out from under conversion therapy involved discursively shifting from having a condition to being human—a process of “building a person”—still incomplete for autistic communities. While legal reforms protect some trans youth from harmful therapies, this does not extend to autistic trans youth, leading us to question at whose expense a rights-bearing trans person was built.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference125 articles.
1. Evidence of increased PTSD symptoms in autistics exposed to applied behavior analysis
2. Csanady, Ashley . 2015. “I never realized that I could be happy”: Committee hears harrowing accounts of conversion therapy. National Post, June 3. https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/i-never-realized-that-i-could-be-happy-committee-hears-harrowing-accounts-of-conversion-therapy
3. Child gender disturbances: A clinical rationale for intervention.
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献