Abstract
Non-technical summaryA major challenge in addressing the loss of benefits and services provided by the natural environment is that it can be difficult to find ways for those who benefit from them to pay for their preservation. We examine one such context in Malawi, where erosion from soils disturbed by agriculture affects not only farmers’ incomes, but also damages aquatic habitat and inhibits the storage and hydropower potential of dams downstream. We demonstrate that payments from hydropower producers to farmers to maintain land cover and prevent erosion can have benefits for all parties involved.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Global and Planetary Change
Reference53 articles.
1. Malawi. (2016) National Agriculture Policy 2016. Lilongwe, Malawi. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/NAP_Final_Signed.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018.
2. Designing spatially explicit incentive programs for habitat conservation: A case study of the Bicknell's thrush wintering grounds
3. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions
4. Benton TG , Fairweather D , Graves A , Harris J , Jones A , Lenton T , Norman R , O'Riordan T , Pope E and Tiffin R (2017) Environmental tipping points and food system dynamics: Main Report, p. 28. http://www.storre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/24796/1/GFS_Tipping%20Points_Main%20Report.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018.
5. Flickering gives early warning signals of a critical transition to a eutrophic lake state
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献