Abstract
Non-technical summaryIn the post-Paris political landscape, the relationship between science and politics is changing. We discuss what this means for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), using recent controversies over negative emissions technologies (NETs) as a window into the fraught politics of producing policy-relevant pathways and scenarios. We suggest that pathways and scenarios have a ‘world-making’ power, potentially shaping the world in their own image and creating new political realities. Assessment bodies like the IPCC need to reflect on this power, and the implications of changing political contexts, in new ways.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Global and Planetary Change
Reference70 articles.
1. ‘Opening up’ geoengineering appraisal: Multi-Criteria Mapping of options for tackling climate change
2. Vaidyanathan G. Nuclear Power Must Make a Comeback for Climate's Sake. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nuclear-power-must-make-a-comeback-for-climate-s-sake/. Accessed 22 March 2018.
3. Climate geoengineering: issues of path-dependence and socio-technical lock-in;Cairns;Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change,2014
4. Avoid 2 Climate Change Research Programme. Overshoot scenarios and their climate response. http://www.avoid.uk.net/2015/09/overshoot-scenarios-and-their-climate-response-a3./. Accessed 10 May 2018.
Cited by
83 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献