Abstract
AbstractWhy do we still have books? To answer this question with views based not on the market trend, nor on the popular feeling that print is outdated and irrelevant, but on the American Bar Association's stated mission of Law Libraries to provide resources that enable legal education,1 this article reviews the potential benefits and determents of different types of legal sources using both print and online formats and discusses whether external pressures should outweigh these factors dependent on the audience.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference31 articles.
1. The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis
2. Possible Futures for the Legal Treatise in an Environment of Wikis, Blogs, and Myriad Online Primary Law Sources;Martin;Law Libr. J.,2016
3. The impact of paper-based versus computerized presentation on text comprehension and memorization
4. The Role of Attorney Mental Models of Law in Case Relevance Determinations: An Exploratory Analysis;Sutton;J. Am. Soc'y Info. Sci.,1994
5. Undergraduates' Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献