Abstract
AbstractIn this paper I use South Africa as a reference point to discuss the company as a juristic person and its relationship to natural persons through the concepts of subjectivity and personhood. I do this in an attempt to reveal that granting of juristic personality as ‘the company’ is not a neutral, organic or inevitable product of the law and economy but a construct symbiotically bound to the colonial state. Underlying this juristic personhood is colonial ideology which perpetuates racialized and gendered poverty and inequality as systemic oppression, in order to deliberately facilitate and maintain conditions of domination and exploitation. Rather than taking the conventional business and human rights starting point that accepts the corporate structure without critique, it is argued that by reorienting away from juristic personality as purportedly ‘neutral’ and reframing the construct, the powers of the company might be curtailed, thereby interrupting these continuing colonial logics.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science,Industrial relations,Business and International Management
Reference41 articles.
1. The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights;Stephens;Berkeley Journal of International Law,2002
2. Governmentality and South Africa’s Edifice of Gender and Sexual Rights
3. THE FICTION OF THE JURISTIC PERSON:
4. The Juristic Person. II
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献