Abstract
AbstractThis article examines the symbolic politics of three pro-state movements that emerged from the “preventive counterrevolution” launched by the Kremlin in response to Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. In 2005, youth movement Nashi played upon war memory at its rallies and branded the opposition “fascist”; in 2012, the Anti-Orange Committee countered opposition protests with mass gatherings at Moscow’s war commemoration sites; in 2015, Antimaidan brought thousands onto Russia’s streets to denounce US-backed regime change and alleged neo-Nazism in Kiev. I show how evocation of the enemy image, through reference to the war experience, played a key role in the symbolism of the preventive counterrevolution. Interviews with activists in these movements discussing their symbolic politics reveal an opposing victim/victor narrative based on an interplay of two World War II myths—the “Great Victory” and the “fascist threat.” Moving beyond approaches that view the Soviet and Russian World War II cult as a triumphalist narrative of the Great Victory over fascism, I conclude that its threat component is an understudied element.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference95 articles.
1. National Association of Parents. 2014. September 25. https://vk.com/wall-59164055_41
2. Lenta.ru . 2015. “V Moskve zavershilsia miting ‘Antimaidana.’” February 21. https://lenta.ru/news/2015/02/21/antimaydan2/
3. The Making of a Dominant Myth: The Second World War and the Construction of Political Identities within the Soviet Polity
4. Nashi . 2005. “Manifest molodezhnogo dvizheniia Nashi.” April 18. https://web.archive.org/web/20050417235355/http://www.nashi.su/pravda/83974709.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献