Author:
Martin Katherine I.,Tokowicz Natasha
Abstract
AbstractTypically concrete words are learned better than abstract words (Kaushanskaya & Rechtzigel, 2012), and nouns are learned better than verbs (Kauschke & Stenneken, 2008). However, most studies on concreteness have not manipulated grammatical class (and vice versa), leaving the relationship between the two unclear. Therefore, in two experiments we examined the effects of grammatical class and concreteness simultaneously in foreign language vocabulary learning. In Experiment 1, English speakers learned ‘foreign language’ words (English pseudowords) mapped to concrete and abstract nouns and verbs. In Experiment 2, English speakers learned German words with the same procedure. Overall, the typical advantages for concrete words and nouns were observed. Hierarchical regression analyses provided evidence that the grammatical class effect is separable from the concreteness effect. This result challenges a strict concreteness-based source of noun/verb differences. The results also suggest that the influences of concreteness and grammatical class may vary across language measures and tasks.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference134 articles.
1. Spelling Acquisition; Effects of Pronouncing Words on Memory for Their Spellings
2. The MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine readable dictionary, Version 2;Wilson;Behavior Research Methods,1988
3. Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological Investigation
4. Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall;Walker;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1999
5. Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献