Author:
Braida Barbara,Rodríguez-Ferreiro Javier,Hernández Mireia
Abstract
AbstractAccording to the “reduced emotionality hypothesis”, we are less emotionally driven when reasoning in a foreign language (FL) than in a native language (NL). We examined whether this foreign language effect (FLe) extends to the way we perceive motivational quotes (i.e., encouraging slogans conveying a profound and inspirational message): we expected FL participants to rate motivational quotes as less profound than NL participants. Strikingly, we observed the opposite: FL participants found motivational quotes more profound than NL participants, even after controlling for potential confounders (e.g., IQ, reasoning style). Both FL and NL participants gave similarly low profundity ratings to pseudo-profound bullshit sentences (i.e., meaningless sentences sounding profound), indicating that the message must be meaningful for the FLe to arise. We propose that, like space or time, language could promote psychological distance. This favours a focus on the background of a message to indicate profoundness.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education