Abstract
AbstractTo avoid penalizing exporters that already paid carbon prices, the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism credits carbon taxes and Emissions Trading Schemes in third countries. By excluding instruments of traditional regulation (e.g. emission standards) and indirect carbon prices (e.g. fuel excise taxes) from this crediting mechanism, the EU is criticized for discriminating against countries that do not follow its climate model, in breach of international trade and climate law. This article seeks to nuance this criticism by arguing that the calculation of actual emissions (instead of default values) under the EU CBAM allows exporters to reflect compliance with foreign emission standards, and thus respects states' right to pursue emission reductions through traditional regulation. However, amendments of the CBAM Regulation are necessary to recognize the positive and negative impact of indirect carbon prices on decarbonization, and the role of carbon-crediting mechanisms in equalizing carbon costs in a more flexible and equitable way.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference8 articles.
1. Securing Compatibility of Carbon Border Adjustments with the Multilateral Climate and Trade Regimes;Durán;International and Comparative Law Quarterly,2023
2. From Unilateral Border Carbon Adjustments to Cooperation in Climate Clubs: Rethinking Exclusion in Light of Trade and Climate Law Constraints;Espa;European Yearbook of International Economic Law,2023
3. Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Systematic Literature Review of the Latest Developments;Zhong;Climate Policy,2023
4. Carbon Policy in Developing Countries: Giving Priority to Non-price Instruments;Finon;Energy Policy,2019