Abstract
AbstractThis article aims to account for the variation in the time it takes for WTO Members to bring compliance following adverse panel rulings. It seeks to answer the question: under what conditions do defendants swiftly implement adverse rulings of WTO panels? I demonstrate that defendants are more likely to comply without delay when the targeted measures involve firms that are integrated into regional and global value chains. When a dispute touches upon the interests of these firms and targets import-restricting measures, they are triggered to mobilize and press for compliance because they rely on foreign imports. In effect, the mobilization of these firms changes the domestic political conditions in favor of timely implementation. I show the plausibility of my argument in a comparative design with four case studies in which the US and Canada acted as defendants in WTO disputes. I control for a number of political factors and also consider legal sources of variation – i.e. the complexity of the form of implementation – that may impact WTO Members’ record of compliance.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Economics and Econometrics
Reference91 articles.
1. The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
2. Jensen B. , D. Quinn , and S. Weymouth (2013), ‘Global Supply Chains, Currency Undervaluation, and Firm Protectionist Demands’, Working Paper 19239, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, http://www.nber.org/papers/w19239 (accessed 17 September 2015).
3. Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO
4. Global Sourcing
5. Verheul S. (2003), ‘Statement on the World Trade Organization's decision on the Canadian dairy export policy’, Speech, Proceedings of the Standing Committee on Agriculture and AgriFood, 18 March, Ottawa.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献